UC Davis
Project sets 2008 cost of California Native Grassland Ecological
Restoration at $225,000 per acre!
Photos and text by Craig Dremann, The Reveg Edge, Box
609,
Redwood City, CA 94064 - (650) 325-7333
The history of the UC Davis/Caltrans grant project
shown on this website, starts Feb. 11, 2003, in Yolo County at
the I-505, Road 14 exit test plot site in the Sacramento Valley,
California:

(Just across the Interstate, there's a second native plant
test plot, planted by the Yolo County RCD, see below).
A couple of acres drill-seeded with several species of
native grasses, seedlings are 2 inches tall, Feb. 11, 2003.

Above: Dunnigan Hills Caltrans test plot, looking south,
February 11, 2003.

Above: The Yolo County RCD test plot, Dunnigan Hills, across
I-505 from the Caltrans plot, March, 2003.
Some of the hummocks in background are the exotic perennial
grasses. Checking the area in September 2004, there's a
stand of about 50% cover of the native perennial grass Nassella
(Purple Needlegrass).
Dunnigan Hills UC Davis/Caltrans site, June 2003. This
first-year's planting was declared a failure and the site was
sprayed in May and a second attempt planned for autumn 2003 ...What
is all that brown stuff?
Lodged polyploid ryegrass,
six inches deep!
This is one of the aggressive pasture-types developed
in Oregon, now showing up here in California as weeds.

Above: October, 2003, with the Dunnigan Hills site burned
and ready to reseed to try again.
SECOND TRY: January 18, 2004: Photos
below show the Dunnigan Hills test plot second attempt underway.

January 2004, part of the site had been recently mulched with
a light covering of native needlegrass straw (Nassella
or Stipa). The exotic grasses have been managed over the whole
two acres, but what is left is a lot of bare soil that's eroding,
plus seedlings of broadleaf weeds: mostly filaree, mustard, dock,
milk thistle, and vetch. Yellow star thistle seedling not observed
yet, but they don't usually show until later in spring.

Oh, no!...May 2004, the upper portion not resown, is
solid yellow star thistle!
However, in May,
2004, the Dunnigan Hills site did have about 1,000 plants of various
native grasses.
AUGUST, 20, 2004. The upper portions of the Dunnigan
site formerly covered with yellow starthistle was mowed earlier
in the summer. Wild oats encroaching, plus some very robust "Blando"
brome into the former native grass test plot area.
The test plots of various species of California
native grasses are still standing in August 2004, but may not
survive though the winter of 2004/2005.
September 9, 2005:
A total of only four native grass plants appears to have survived
in the whole Dunnigan Hills test plot site, and the area was recently
mowed.

Former upper test plot area.

Test plot area, arrow is where the line of wooden stakes is located.
UPDATE: July 12, 2006 - Another replanting
attempt, unfortunately failing:

Between September 2005 and spring 2006, the test plot was plowed
and resown by drill-seeding with Elymus glaucus and some four-inch
tall Purple Needlegrass, that is barely surviving as an understory
beneath the weeds. This test plot has been treated like an annual
flower-bed, resown every year and hoping for the best. No ecological
restoration technologies have been used or successful techniques
invented on-site, that would guarantee plant survival and establishment.
Plants seen in the photo are exotics, with the 4% native
grass cover underneath the weed canopy. By September 2006, this
whole area was mowed to about 3 inches tall, and you could clearly
see about 1% Purple Needlegrass cover still surviving. That means
for 2 acres, only about 1,000 sq. feet total of native grass cover
survived.

Spring 2006, UC Davis took over the Yolo County RCD test plot
area, and it was plowed and replanted, by drill seeding on 8 inch-centers,
mostly Purple Needlegrass and some Elymus glaucus, which has
formed a nearly solid stand by July 2006. Each plant is growing
on 4-8" centers within the drill-row. However, in the distance
you can see scattered wild lettuce and mustard plants, and even
at these very low amounts, could eventually start the domino-like
collapse of this nice planting.
Along the mowed roadside edge of this planting at
this time, is a solid 80% yellow star thistle, 10% mustard, 5%
ryegrass and 5% wild lettuce cover, just waiting to invade.
Planting only two species of grasses does not necessarily recreate
a self-sustaining California grassland ecosystem . Scattered within
the planting are these same weeds, plus a understory carpet of
the vine, bindweed.
August, 2007,
planting is still intact.
Notice the wide
spaces, without other species of native plants between the native
bunchgrass plants. "Vacancies" in the planting can
allowing weeds to colonize. Islands of weeds, once they get
established, like patches of mustard, can unravel the planting
from within. Or star thiostle can move into the bare spaces,
like a wave, from the edge.

August, 2008, Oh, no, what's all that spiny stuff invading
the native grassland? Mostly yellow star thistle coming in
from the edges! The green in the center, is the wild lettuce starting
the destruction of the planting from within. About 10% of the
planting is already solidly infested, and will probably last another
ten years under drought conditions, or 2-4 years with normal rainfall.

CONCLUSION: UC Davis Project
Sets the Price of a temporarily Restored California Grassland
habitat
The results of the UC Davis project, funded by Caltrans, has set
the price in 2008 of restoring a temporary low-elevation non-riparian
native California grassland from scratch, after five years
of test plots, which will probably last a decade or less, before
the weeds wipe it out again.
UC Davis tried to get two acres of California native
grasslands established from scratch, but without using any
licensed native grassland restoration processes nor inventing
or using any successful licensed ecological restoration technologies.
Instead the project used the currently available public-domain
restoration technologies, plus may have been trying the concept
of "adaptive management".
In August 2008, using the current public domain
technologies, and possibly adaptive management techniques,
the costs of restoring a temporary, low-elevation, non-riparian
grassland in California has been effectively set by the results
of this project at $225,000 per acre.
The results of this study may have significant impacts
on grassland mitigation projects around the State that are
being currently conducted by CALFED, the U.S. Bureau
of Reclamation and other agencies, The Nature Conservancy
in managing land that they own (TNC), and the various Habitat
Conservation Plans (HCPs) and other permits and Section
7 mitigations around California that require native grassland
restoration.
If the best agricultural university in California
can't permanently repair an arid ecosystem like a native Western
grassland for less than $200,000 per acre, why should
developers, grazing permittees or miners be allowed to destroy
any more native grasslands, until we have the scientific knowledge
on how to restore them at a reasonable cost?
I-80
TEST PLOTS:
A second Caltrans native grass test plot is along I-80 near
Dixon, photographed March, 2003., both sides of the Interstate
in the shoulder. Photos show native grasses, drill-seeded and
a few inches tall.

The I-80 test plots are half-way between Midway Road exit and
the Dixon West "A" Street exit.
If you are traveling eastbound from Vacaville, the plot is
1.3 miles past the Midway Road exit, after where the high power
line crosses, and before you get to a line of trees and the Phone
Call box 80-342.
Traveling Westbound from Sacramento, past the Dixon exit,
the test plot starts at the Vacaville/Fairfaield/San Francisco
mileage sign and Call box 80-343 (PM 34.00) and goes toward where
the high power lines cross the Interstate.
By October 2003, the I-80 plots were abandoned.
Checking either side of I-80, there was little or no survival
of the native grasses, and there was no evidence that another
attempt was going to be made to succeed here.
This $90,000 per year, 5-year grant is Caltrans
second major contract in the agency's history to study the
conversion of roadside exotics back to local native plants. Details
of the grant can be seen at http://www.ecoseeds.com/grant.html
Other links:
---See other State DOTs research with roadside natives: http://www.ecoseeds.com/topdot.html
---See other State DOT web pages on native plants:
http://www.ecoseeds.com/roadside.web.html
---See what questions need answers before native plants for roadsides
can begin: http://www.ecoseeds.com/questions.html
---See what type of roadside problems that native plants may be
a solution (erosion, exotics): http://www.ecoseeds.com/highways.html
---See what research and technologies are necessary for successes
with roadside native plants: http://www.ecoseeds.com/standards.html
---See a checklist of ten items to get faster successes:
http://www.ecoseeds.com/talk.html
Other Caltrans Roadside
Vegetation Programs:
Adopt-A-Highway "WILDFLOWER PLANTING"
(Photo June 2004)
Caltrans has an "Adopt-A-Highway Program", and
each of the 12 Districts have District Coordinators, plus a printed
handbook---Chapter ten is "Wildflower Planting". Participants
of the Wildflower program agree to plant wildflowers on a minimum
of three acres of highway right-of-way and establish them for
a minimum of two years. "Wildflower courtesy signs"
are placed by Caltrans with the name of the company or group involved
in the planting.
The "Wildflower Planting" program's desired result,
perhaps that Caltrans hoped for when the program was initiated,
was that the adoptees might develop at no cost to Caltrans successful
"wildflower" roadside vegetation with low maintenance
costs, better than the flammable annual exotic grasses and exotic
weeds normally along California's roadsides.
Unfortunately, none of the California native "Wildflower
Plantings" over the last decade, seem to be successful,
and driving up and down the State you will see numerous "Wildflower"
signs, with no fields of wildflowers at the various sites. The
program has resulted in providing cheap advertising for companies,
without the companies having to pay the minimum of $225,000 per
acre that a successful wildflower planting in California would
cost, as the UC Davis project has established.
Caltrans' "Wildflower Planting" program should
be discontinued state-wide, until the costs of successfully
establishing a wildflower planting drops into a price per acre
that a civic group or commercial business can actually afford.
Updated August 23, 2008