UC Davis Project sets 2008 cost of California Native Grassland Ecological Restoration at $225,000 per acre!


Photos and text by Craig Dremann, The Reveg Edge, Box 609,
Redwood City, CA 94064 - (650) 325-7333

The history of the UC Davis/Caltrans grant project shown on this website, starts Feb. 11, 2003, in Yolo County at the I-505, Road 14 exit test plot site in the Sacramento Valley, California:


(Just across the Interstate, there's a second native plant test plot, planted by the Yolo County RCD, see below).

A couple of acres drill-seeded with several species of native grasses, seedlings are 2 inches tall, Feb. 11, 2003.

Above: Dunnigan Hills Caltrans test plot, looking south, February 11, 2003.

Above: The Yolo County RCD test plot, Dunnigan Hills, across I-505 from the Caltrans plot, March, 2003.
Some of the hummocks in background are the exotic perennial grasses. Checking the area in September 2004, there's a stand of about 50% cover of the native perennial grass Nassella (Purple Needlegrass).


Dunnigan Hills UC Davis/Caltrans site, June 2003. This first-year's planting was declared a failure and the site was sprayed in May and a second attempt planned for autumn 2003 ...What is all that brown stuff?

Lodged polyploid ryegrass, six inches deep!
This is one of the aggressive pasture-types developed in Oregon, now showing up here in California as weeds.


Above: October, 2003, with the Dunnigan Hills site burned and ready to reseed to try again.

SECOND TRY: January 18, 2004: Photos below show the Dunnigan Hills test plot second attempt underway.

January 2004, part of the site had been recently mulched with a light covering of native needlegrass straw (Nassella or Stipa). The exotic grasses have been managed over the whole two acres, but what is left is a lot of bare soil that's eroding, plus seedlings of broadleaf weeds: mostly filaree, mustard, dock, milk thistle, and vetch. Yellow star thistle seedling not observed yet, but they don't usually show until later in spring.


Oh, no!...May 2004, the upper portion not resown, is solid yellow star thistle!

However, in May, 2004, the Dunnigan Hills site did have about 1,000 plants of various native grasses.

AUGUST, 20, 2004. The upper portions of the Dunnigan site formerly covered with yellow starthistle was mowed earlier in the summer. Wild oats encroaching, plus some very robust "Blando" brome into the former native grass test plot area.

The test plots of various species of California native grasses are still standing in August 2004, but may not survive though the winter of 2004/2005.

September 9, 2005: A total of only four native grass plants appears to have survived in the whole Dunnigan Hills test plot site, and the area was recently mowed.


Former upper test plot area.


Test plot area, arrow is where the line of wooden stakes is located.

UPDATE: July 12, 2006 - Another replanting attempt, unfortunately failing:

Between September 2005 and spring 2006, the test plot was plowed and resown by drill-seeding
with Elymus glaucus and some four-inch tall Purple Needlegrass, that is barely surviving as an understory beneath the weeds. This test plot has been treated like an annual flower-bed, resown every year and hoping for the best. No ecological restoration technologies have been used or successful techniques invented on-site, that would guarantee plant survival and establishment.

Plants seen in the photo are exotics, with the 4% native grass cover underneath the weed canopy. By September 2006, this whole area was mowed to about 3 inches tall, and you could clearly see about 1% Purple Needlegrass cover still surviving. That means for 2 acres, only about 1,000 sq. feet total of native grass cover survived.


Spring 2006, UC Davis took over the Yolo County RCD test plot area, and it was plowed and replanted, by drill seeding on 8 inch-centers,
mostly Purple Needlegrass and some Elymus glaucus, which has formed a nearly solid stand by July 2006. Each plant is growing on 4-8" centers within the drill-row. However, in the distance you can see scattered wild lettuce and mustard plants, and even at these very low amounts, could eventually start the domino-like collapse of this nice planting.

Along the mowed roadside edge of this planting at this time, is a solid 80% yellow star thistle, 10% mustard, 5% ryegrass and 5% wild lettuce cover, just waiting to invade. Planting only two species of grasses does not necessarily recreate a self-sustaining California grassland ecosystem . Scattered within the planting are these same weeds, plus a understory carpet of the vine, bindweed.

August, 2007, planting is still intact.

Notice the wide spaces, without other species of native plants between the native bunchgrass plants. "Vacancies" in the planting can allowing weeds to colonize. Islands of weeds, once they get established, like patches of mustard, can unravel the planting from within. Or star thiostle can move into the bare spaces, like a wave, from the edge.


August, 2008, Oh, no, what's all that spiny stuff invading the native grassland? Mostly yellow star thistle coming in from the edges! The green in the center, is the wild lettuce starting the destruction of the planting from within. About 10% of the planting is already solidly infested, and will probably last another ten years under drought conditions, or 2-4 years with normal rainfall.



CONCLUSION: UC Davis Project Sets the Price of a temporarily Restored California Grassland habitat

The results of the UC Davis project, funded by Caltrans, has set the price in 2008 of restoring a temporary low-elevation non-riparian native California grassland from scratch,
after five years of test plots, which will probably last a decade or less, before the weeds wipe it out again.

UC Davis tried to get two acres of California native grasslands established from scratch, but without using any licensed native grassland restoration processes nor inventing or using any successful licensed ecological restoration technologies. Instead the project used the currently available public-domain restoration technologies, plus may have been trying the concept of "adaptive management".

In August 2008, using the current public domain technologies, and possibly adaptive management techniques, the costs of restoring a temporary, low-elevation, non-riparian grassland in California has been effectively set by the results of this project at $225,000 per acre.

The results of this study may have significant impacts on grassland mitigation projects around the State that are being currently conducted by CALFED, the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation and other agencies, The Nature Conservancy in managing land that they own (TNC), and the various Habitat Conservation Plans (HCPs) and other permits and Section 7 mitigations around California that require native grassland restoration.

If the best agricultural university in California can't permanently repair an arid ecosystem like a native Western grassland for less than $200,000 per acre, why should developers, grazing permittees or miners be allowed to destroy any more native grasslands, until we have the scientific knowledge on how to restore them at a reasonable cost?




I-80 TEST PLOTS:
A second Caltrans native grass test plot is along I-80
near Dixon, photographed March, 2003., both sides of the Interstate in the shoulder. Photos show native grasses, drill-seeded and a few inches tall.



The I-80 test plots are half-way between Midway Road exit and the Dixon West "A" Street exit.
If you are traveling eastbound from Vacaville,
the plot is 1.3 miles past the Midway Road exit, after where the high power line crosses, and before you get to a line of trees and the Phone Call box 80-342.

Traveling Westbound from Sacramento,
past the Dixon exit, the test plot starts at the Vacaville/Fairfaield/San Francisco mileage sign and Call box 80-343 (PM 34.00) and goes toward where the high power lines cross the Interstate.

By October 2003, the I-80 plots were abandoned. Checking either side of I-80, there was little or no survival of the native grasses, and there was no evidence that another attempt was going to be made to succeed here.

This $90,000 per year, 5-year grant is Caltrans second major contract in the agency's history to study the conversion of roadside exotics back to local native plants. Details of the grant can be seen at http://www.ecoseeds.com/grant.html

Other links:


---See other State DOTs research with roadside natives: http://www.ecoseeds.com/topdot.html

---See other State DOT web pages on native plants: http://www.ecoseeds.com/roadside.web.html

---See what questions need answers before native plants for roadsides can begin: http://www.ecoseeds.com/questions.html

---See what type of roadside problems that native plants may be a solution (erosion, exotics): http://www.ecoseeds.com/highways.html

---See what research and technologies are necessary for successes with roadside native plants: http://www.ecoseeds.com/standards.html

---See a checklist of ten items to get faster successes: http://www.ecoseeds.com/talk.html


Other Caltrans Roadside Vegetation Programs:
Adopt-A-Highway "WILDFLOWER PLANTING"

(Photo June 2004)
Caltrans has an "Adopt-A-Highway Program", and each of the 12 Districts have District Coordinators, plus a printed handbook---Chapter ten is "Wildflower Planting". Participants of the Wildflower program agree to plant wildflowers on a minimum of three acres of highway right-of-way and establish them for a minimum of two years. "Wildflower courtesy signs" are placed by Caltrans with the name of the company or group involved in the planting.

The "Wildflower Planting" program's desired result, perhaps that Caltrans hoped for when the program was initiated, was that the adoptees might develop at no cost to Caltrans successful "wildflower" roadside vegetation with low maintenance costs, better than the flammable annual exotic grasses and exotic weeds normally along California's roadsides.

Unfortunately, none of the California native "Wildflower Plantings" over the last decade, seem to be successful, and driving up and down the State you will see numerous "Wildflower" signs, with no fields of wildflowers at the various sites. The program has resulted in providing cheap advertising for companies, without the companies having to pay the minimum of $225,000 per acre that a successful wildflower planting in California would cost, as the UC Davis project has established.

Caltrans' "Wildflower Planting" program should be discontinued state-wide, until the costs of successfully establishing a wildflower planting drops into a price per acre that a civic group or commercial business can actually afford.



Updated August 23, 2008